Subscribe to our newsletter to get alerts about new posts, local news, and industry insights.
Last week, the Florida House of Representatives approved its version of the state’s medical marijuana bill (HB 1397) by a 105 to 9 vote. Now, it goes to the Senate, but it’s possible that the Senate could make additional changes and send it back to the House. In other words, this story isn’t over yet. Let’s take a look at where the marijuana industry in Florida stands based on the House’s version of the bill.
To be very clear, the House’s version of HB 1397 is far from perfect, and critics say it doesn’t represent the will of the more than 72% of Floridians who voted to expand medical marijuana access in November 2016. With that said, here are the key changes to Amendment 2 included in the approved bill:
While these changes seem positive, many marijuana advocates believe they’re not enough to ensure all patients have access to the medical marijuana they need. For example, the House’s bill doesn’t cover all forms of chronic pain nor does it allow smoke-able marijuana. However, the biggest point of contention is related to the licensing system – specifically, the number of licenses available in the state.
Currently, there are seven licensed growers in Florida, and as discussed in the Marijuana Licensing Reference Guide: 2017 Edition, these are fully stacked licenses. That means, a license holder in Florida must control the entire supply and distribution chain from seed to sale, including growing, manufacturing, distributing, and selling. This system has been referred to as a legal pot cartel that not only limits patient access but also allows price-fixing and reduced competition. As a result, critics fear that patients will continue to use the black market.
While this monopoly is a sore spot for advocates of increased marijuana access for patients, it doesn’t seem to be a problem for investors who are investing heavily despite the uncertainty of the state’s marijuana program.
It appears that the state’s current license holders don’t have a problem with the monopoly either. Five of the seven existing license holders in the state have yet to provide a public opinion about it. According to information from The Capitolist, Surterra Therapeutics of Hillsborough County and Grow Healthy of Polk County support the expansion of the total number of license holders if it increases patient access. However, CHT Medical of Alachua County, Trulieve of Gadsden County, Knox Medical of Orange County, The Green Solution of Alachua County, and Modern Health Concepts declined to answer.
The House’s bill has been sent to the Senate for review. The Senate could either approve it or amend it and send it back to the House. No matter what they decide, the state’s 60-day legislative session ends on May 5th, so the clock is ticking. Keep in mind, rules for the amendment, which was enacted on January 3rd, must be in place by July 2017 and implemented by October 2017.
What do you think of HB 1397? Weigh in by leaving a comment below.